10.AZK-Verdeckte Kriegsführung- Blick hinter die Kulissen der Machtpolit...

##########################################
I say to a second luminary in intelligence service. We welcome you a man - I think there was hardly a AZK in advance where it has not been: "Oh you should times the Daniele Ganser invite the Dr. Daniele Ganser. "Today he is in our midst. Applause for Daniele Ganser. [Applause] Before he comes up, I want him back shortly imagine. That we know - for people who do not know this name - in that We know who he is. First, something personal. He is Swiss, father of two pretty Children. I have still never seen, it just means girl and boy but known to fall so the apple does not far from the tree, that must be pretty. [Audience laughs] Daniele Ganser is a look behind the scenes of power politics enter and will talk about covert warfare to us. And so we know in what skills he is here, be some brief information about Life: Daniele Ganser is a Swiss historian, energy and peace researcher. He directs the Swiss Institute "peace-, energy, market opinion research". I have the now said on Swiss-German, with him the whole thing is in English, but the spare I, [Ivo laughs] you when I say that does not sound good. Anyway short abbreviation is SIPER, SIPER, in Basel. He studied as an energy expert global struggle Oil and the potential on renewable energy. So its territory is quite far. Something to his resume: Dr. Daniele Ganser is a Swiss historian, specialized in contemporary history, since 1945, since 1945 History and International Politics. His research focuses on are: Peace Research, geostrategy, covert warfare - so here we are again in the subject - resources fighting and economic policy. Dr. Daniele Ganser teaches at the universities: St. Gallen, Basel, Zurich and Lucerne. In St. Gallen so in the University of St. Gallen to history and the future of energy systems, in Basel in postgraduate studies on conflict analysis to the global fight over oil. At the University of Zurich and Lucerne, he teaches contemporary history, from 2001-2003 he is Senior Researcher, so that means someone for market research and public opinion Investigations carried out. At the Center for Security Studies of the École Polytechnique College, briefly: ETH. In cooperation with the Swiss foreign ministry, the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, in short: EDA, he examined the impact of globalization on war and peace. He was a member of the expert group to promote peace and strengthen human rights. I must now ask high: Dr. Daniele Ganser of Basel. Welcome. [Applause] Great to have you as can be there today that they have accepted our request. (Little dialogue: Dr. Ganser: "Hello Mr. Sasek" Ivo Sasek.: "And a lot of success in speaking". Dr. Ganser: "Thank you, I have a remote control? There. "Great".).
Yes, good day together. My name is Daniele Ganser. I would like to thanks for the invitation thank. I like to be very open to them. It was difficult for me, get. I want to explain to them why. I am moving in the University, moving me with the scientists. Since I got the invitation. AZK I did not know, I "googled" Mr. Sasek I "googled". Today you do that always, if you do not know someone. Then stood there: he is a Christian. Then I thought: is fine. We are in a Christian country. Then stood there: he has 11 children. Have then thought, but that's a lot - also in order. Then stood there: "He prevails against wars of aggression in. "I have read a lot, but when I this read rate, I knew, "I go." [applause] There are connecting these elements. But they also need to understand there are separating Elements. And if you want to overcome this, one has to set up trust. And the separating Element was that there was: "Mr. Sasek is a conspiracy theorist." The they need to know that will hold me other colleagues. The will say to me: "I saw on the internet ..." These colleagues are not here, but see the then the Internet. The will I then say, "Where have you been back" Since going I say: "There is a man who is committed to war, so he has my respect deserved. "Then they will say:" Are you agree with everything he says "I'm going? say: "No idea. I've never met him. "We have to now hit the first time. Then they will say: "Yes, but he's a conspiracy theorist". So it is a neuralgic point for me. Because: I was already as conspiracy theorists attacked. And I want to tell them: this is painful. I am not a conspiracy theorist. I am a researcher, the secret warfare investigated and that's just not the same. In covert warfare, they must investigate lies and violence and that is an ugly combination, but there is. I told myself: "I want to investigate." It has left me for some time alone. They found the love that I Investigate. It was always up to the university, but from a certain altitude the problems have used. Since you have just said, "We do not want they express themselves in this way. We do not want to investigate these things so and that they also talk about it publicly. "Because you prove me with the facts no errors could you just said I was a conspiracy theorist. That's not funny. Since I was sad. I really was not funny. I am a scientist, who tried to do a good job. If you want to know something about fission is today, then is precisely this term "conspiracy theory" crucial. People will split. The neighbor will tell them: "You are a conspiracy theorist" if you finds out what considerations they make. And I really want to encourage them to say that they are committed to provide for peace. That they the term reject conspiracy theory. This term does not contribute to finding the truth, but it leads to the cleavage. He is a cleavage term. And the example that I myself had this fear and that I have overcome it, am I just now here. So, that was the initiation. But it is not easy. There are always several Levels of communication. You are here me very sympathetic to, but the video, the other then see will give me a lot of problems, that is so, I know, but I am willing to accept these troubles on me, because the matter is important. [greater Applause from the audience] I think this is the way for all referrals that. I think about 50 Lectures a year. Many of them in front of private industry. Banking, insurance, etc .... They want all know what goes on behind the scenes. Some are from NGOs, renewable energy movements or those who build solar houses ... Yesterday I was in Austria at a solar company. Previously I was with Volvo in Madrid. They want there to introduce a bus, the less energy needs, etc .... That is: there are very intense global discussions. And I think the people to talk to each other, no matter where they come forth if they have title if they no title who, from whatever religion they come. This is always the principle of the peace movement been. And it is also today and should not divide us. Now with those involved in covert warfare. This is precisely my main area. I examine covert warfare. This is very, very rare that it actually in Switzerland Scientists out there who have just embarked on this yet comical area. The actors are the "Special forces". (On screen: SAS, Green Berets, etc.) that are So special forces in the military. One may say that these are the best in the military. The speak different languages ​​and can kill without realizing it. They can operate behind the lines. Therefore, there is a fascination with this. You may not say that only is just something that no one is interested, but there is a very, very great fascination for these special units. The have their own magazines and are very, very active on the Internet. The second, which just this covert warfare run, are the secret, CIA, MI6, Mossad and others. And these two units are state actors. This is relatively crucial point. Thus, the operating actually with taxpayers' money and they operate in an area that is often illegal. And here we come in this difficult democratic discussion where one wonders: "Because funds Are used for illegal purposes?" And that is a very, very difficult discussion. There is a third category, which I have not listed here, and these are the Private Military Companys, PMC's as Blackwater, etc.. As is actually the secret warfare outsourced to a private firm. We have heard it from Jürgen Elsässer that according BND, according to the Federal Intelligence Service, these operators are operating in Ukraine. We know they were operating in Afghanistan. And they are more difficult to control, because there are private actors who are paid only as from the Pentagon. This is a picture of real Special Forces, but with the things with which we deal is there (on the screen is an image shown on a computer game). We communicate covert warfare today as a video game. Very many young people play these video games. This game called Special Forces Team X. So Special Forces are again these special units and one has to wonder, why a 12-year-old boy plays. And the answer is: because it fascinated him. Yes. It has nothing to do with reality in the sense that it does not clear a real, political affairs, but it only takes the fascination and the interest of people and it passes into a game. As long as it is a game, does not harm it in the political landscape. It is also true that some of the special forces also be trained on video games sometimes. The other approach, which we have with the special forces or the intelligence is, the cinema. We look to love to the cinema. Here they have James Bond. A very known film. This is Daniel Craig. He plays the MI6 agent James Bond. So MI6 is the secret and all to look at that in the movie, as it were, the newly Evil shoots. This is always the same plot. And they see that the evil then quickly change. In the cold war it has always shot the Russians and now shoots He Muslims. And the changes flowing and but that flows in us pure and somehow we do not even know exactly why that has changed. But that is as much: in fiction is always installed the latest bogeyman reality. I have previously written about at all not understood that this is so. But so be it. I have a boy also like James Bond watched. So I do not play video games. That's not my generation. But these films I've enjoyed watched and I have long failed to understand what was is operated for propaganda with my head. I also, perhaps they know the, "Top Gun" seen. This is a film with Tom Cruise and flying there really the fast fliers. I thought that was great, I Say it to them openly. I found that super, I was a teenager. Later I found out that if they want to make a war movie with aircraft carriers and planes, then they have the script first give the Pentagon. And if the Pentagon says. "Good script" Then they get the aircraft carriers and planes because they do not otherwise have, yes. And when the Pentagon finds the script badly and says: "Yes, the enemies here are the wrong" - Then they get up airplanes. And then they can make out of cardboard, but then nobody schaut's on. The special forces are in the cinema with great success. There are these Film Rambo. Rambo is of course a fictional character. This is an actor like Daniel Craig. He is also an actor. He has never killed anyone, Daniel Craig. Even Rambo, Sylvester Stallone has never really shot someone, but in the film Of course thousands. Yes. He plays a unit, a representative of the "Green Berets". The are the green hats. This is a unit of the Americans. That is: I note that we have a very big fascination for covert warfare, but we treat it in 95% of cases purely fictional in Europe and the US. And that, I now what actually try is to leave this fictional terrain and with them in the real covert go warfare because: the Gibt's indeed. And I take it twice with the first 1953 in Iran in the operation "Ajax". That is, here I would like to present to you now: as is covert warfare now used in the last 60, 70 years and what for results she has. So there are all historical examples. Iran had a government under President Mossadegh in the 1950s. (Picture) He was the Prime Minister and he wanted to nationalize the Iranian oil in order the people have more of it. The English had then checked the oil in Iran, the was British Petroleum, the predecessor of British Petroleum, and they had no joy, that now the Iranians the oil itself want. OK. So now comes the democratically elected Prime Minister of this country and wants the oil nationalization and since Saying British: "We are obliged to rush." ​​But now they can not simply an invasion making that would speak not appreciated by the people, but they have the Send secret that the overthrow in silence, without that we in Europe, in the USA remember anything about it. Since the British had the foreign secret service, which is called MI6. The wanted to make this fall, but needed to do the Americans. The foreign secret the Americans called CIA. And they have gone together in Iran and have Mossadegh overthrown and then have reversed this nationalization of oil. This has happened, that is the real story, and one wonders today - we try to reconstruct as a historian - HOW did they do that? We actually in the Research a single agent, his name is Kermit Roosevelt, he is known, he sees not like Daniel Craig, but that is now in the real world, so it looks like there out. This is a real agent, he is born in 1916 died in 2000th He has this planned overthrow the government and a book later wrote "Counter Coup: The struggle for the control of Iran "That has already been published in the 70s, that is, we know very, very long, as the Americans have overthrown the government in Iran. Roosevelt admitted in 1953 that the CIA and the British Secret Service this coup have carried out and that they have this destabilized Iran first. They have So staged a wave of shootings and bombings. Because: a country so to speak, in to overthrow the crisis, they need this kind of destabilization. And he actually also said that these terrorist attacks and these bombs that the then Iranian President Mossadegh has attached. So that they understand the AS works "Covert warfare"? Suppose they had an agent, or an agent, or they were a member of a special forces unit and their mission in a country that Government overthrow. So this is now no instructions, which they should follow, I just want to say, they have to think already clean you, or they understand it Not. Then they must use the land destabilizing force. You can not somehow discussions make or mathematical discourses lead, but they need to destabilize the country by force and this violence then attach the ruler. So they have to say: "Here a gab's Terrorist attack, your ruler is responsible for it. "But they have de facto the terrorist attack carried out. So this is the combination of a lie AND violence. This is the "secret warfare". And it works. There's an American journalist who called James Risen, and then examined, AS the CIA itself this government fall describes. You have to understand whenever the CIA is doing something, then it writes its own history. She really writes pure as it happened. But the story they do not get that comes into CIA archive. And in this CIA archive it superimposed a long time and we would of course very, very happy, we could see that, we can sometimes, but we can usually only after 50 or 60 years. And Risen had access in 2000, ie the are now 50 years after the fall and he says the own history of the CIA says, "The secret history says, the house of at least one prominent Muslim what bombed by CIA agents posing as Communists. " So what is the technique here? They dress up. OK? So how can you explain now for the Swiss. It's like a Ticino posing as Jura and the Jura can go up a bomb and says the Jura are aggressive. Understand it so? That's the way it is! That is, they assume a different shell, perform in this Case Violence and thereby discredit the case that they believed only the show's sake to have. And that's "real life". Thats how it works. I have some English quotes, but I translate, "the overthrow of Mossadegh used the false flag strategy of tension technique ". This is a term that covered in the " Warfare "always shows up and I want to pass it were you, that you know the term "false flag" that is "false flag". This means, So for example you are a pirate ship and want to attack a merchant ship, then simply hoist another flag and say we are an English ship and hardly gets you closer, you hoist the last moment perhaps your pirate flag and board the other ship. Since you naturally by deception advantage. The "strategy of tension", which means "strategy of tension" that is simple: they create chaos in the country. And you can stir up in each country. Make them nothing in front! You can do this in any country and it is very, very difficult for the police and the intelligence and security forces, or for teachers or professors, the quick to realize what is really happening. "CIA officers orchestrating the Iran coup Directly worked with royalist Iranian military officers ". This is now the official CIA history. That is: first is carried out at the "covert warfare" with sections of the military on the country to destabilize the at destabilization are interested. Yes, they go towards the land, look at what are the officers dissatisfied and would be ready to overthrow the government, depending on the. They need that must They feed on your page. "... And directed a campaign of bombings by Iranians posing as members of the Communist Party ... "This is now a long time ago. This is the "cold war", then the Communists were the "bad guys", so has it made a lot of sense that the bombs were placed by the Communists. I would like simply point out that we now know that's wrong. OK? They will say now: "Super, that was in 1953, how slow are you?" I can only say that we historians are slow, but we are sure exactly which is reliable knowledge. At the moment, the original moments in Iran, as having back then, is simply this: (picture) - there are burning cars, people who get shot. That is then always the same, that does not change until today. But the underlying structure that need to be identified. Of course there are Iranians, who already realized at the time that the Americans actually intervene (image) here writes man "Yankees go home", which means as much as: USA please intervenes not in our national affairs. What happened in Europe in the same year is that we prefer to busy ourselves with fictions to have. This means that - rather than that we have seen through this reality - have we "James Bond" read. "Casino Royale" came in 1953 in exactly the same year, when the government was really thrown off Iran from MI6 (image), and that was the first author, Ian Fleming. Ian Fleming is a writer and James Bond is a fictional agent and the like we. OK? That is, because you have time to be honest, we love the fiction and the reality, which sometimes is too much to us. I understand that also because: in fiction, one is always on the good side, so are indeed the scripts, otherwise they can not sell them yes. But in reality it is sometimes on the wrong side and you do not want hear. Then there was an apology and the apology came (picture) in 2000, So even just 50 years on from the Americans. The Secretary of State Albright, then in the Administration Clinton has said: "It is easy to understand that many Iranians these American intervention in their internal affairs disapprove. "This is now the apology, much better, it does not. Another apology from Obama arrived yet: (Picture) "In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government ". have (Übers .: middle of the "Cold War" the United States a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government played). He did - and this is important - said in Cairo of 2009. You must know, Cairo in Egypt. In Egypt, we know these relationships and since he had to say it, because everyone in the room knew it. And it is for the United States, of course, very shameful that they keep saying: "Iran is evil and we are good," while the Iranians yet know that the Americans overthrew the Iranian government. If it reversed would be if Iran had 1953 their American government overthrown, then know it. But the reverse is they do not know and then they somehow feel Iran is a land of barbarians that should also bombard. This type of Warfare called "information warfare", ie information war. So you share them certain information with, other one keeps away from them and consequently there is their Iran-image. If now posted every day on this American coup in Iran would, if Iran ever just mentioned, would the people in another Perception project. Moving on, I just do one country after another. (Image) Cuba 1962 there was the "Operation Northwoods". Northwoods is simply the Technical term for this exercise. You need to remember, is the Cuban history indeed interesting: 1959 came as Fidel Castro to power (picture), the Americans had not enjoy Fidel Castro. He Battista overthrown, that was a dictator and Fidel Castro has said, we do now because another company and we close the Casinos where you could always pure fly from Miami etc. Then he Nixon (image) taken and Nixon hated Fidel Castro immediately and Nixon decided that he Fidel Castro want to overthrow. He thought that is it easy to succeed, you have the so-called "Bay of Pigs" performed. This is in April 1961 again an exercise in the field of "covert warfare". Since the CIA has recruited people who then arrived on a ship. With this ship, one is driven over in Cuba and attempted to overthrow the government of Fidel Castro, which has not succeeded. Because one has first the air force of Fidel Castro is not turned off and that is a mistake. You can not with ships taking an island and the island has the Air Force because: then the Air Force sinking ships and so that was a total disaster. Americans have actually Fidel Castro and Che Guevara radicalized (image). Che Guevara has been observed in 1954 in Guatemala, as the Americans have Arbenz overthrown. Arbenz was president of Guatemala, he has carried out a land reform. This land reform has led to the large-landowners and the company "United Fruit", today "Chiquita" these bananas sold (I've also previously collected this Banana adhesive without I had an idea about the politics of Chiquita, I think at the end I then an inflatable banana for the swimming pool obtained, so maybe you is that too happens, but I always say, later one is wiser). Here was this story so: you could not overthrow Fidel Castro with the Bay of Pigs invasion and Fidel Castro has thrown yet (picture) Nikita Khrushchev around the arm and the Russians were naturally the enemies - or are there again - the Americans in the Cold War and then the representatives of the American government - then President Kennedy - said, is there not a possibility that we create a reason to Fidel Castro to finally overthrow. Once it has the CIA it were not done with the Bay of Pigs invasion from April 1961 it has been said: "We are trying but whether the Pentagon has a good idea." The Pentagon has then designed a plan that has not run, but I want to tell you, because it shows the technique "false flag", "strategy of tension", So "false flag" and "voltage" - that is planned in the Pentagon at the top, that's not something a unterrangiger officer comes up with, but that came from above. This document "top secret", or "top secret" was declassified, now, (image) and it comes out in March 1962 - it was around 40 years until it was declassified - Today it is declassified, and it is all about military order "justification for US Intervention in Cuba ", simply called" justification for American intervention in Cuba ". How can you bring the American people to the fact that they for a US war against the Cuban are? And that makes it so: (picture) 1. An idea: "Remember the Maine incident Could be Arranged in Several forms: We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay . And blame Cuba "This translates as: We could an American ship in blow, namely an American ship at Guantanamo Bay is. Guantanamo is part of Cuba and the Americans had a foothold. The base may not Fidel, but is well known since the Guantanamo story. Obama Guantanamo not resolved, you know, but the idea here is to blow them a ship in the air and say the other is there. This is as if I now fast here a weapon take, I shoot in the foot and say, "Mr. Sasek, you shot me! Really, that's the last. "So that. There is the back you would never see it, they would never see back there, and think: "Does the now actually shot?" And that goes so fast. This combination of lies and deception is very dangerous. 2. "We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington "So [translated]. we could carry out a campaign of terror in the United States. And then Fidel Castro attach. "Exploding a few plastic bombs", ie explosive bombs plastic go up allow, "in care fully chosen spots", at selected locations, "The arrest of Cuban agents "some Cubans arrested," and the release of prepared documents "and then: the publication of altered documents, which prove that the Cubans behind these Terrorist attacks are "would therefore be helpful", would also be virtually ... "in Projecting the idea of ​​an irresponsible government. "... Would be handy to this idea of ​​a irresponsible government, would in this case are precisely meant Cubans to project. This means that the battle for public opinion is intense. And I at the University of Zurich, where a course on "Covert warfare." Not because I want that the students do later, but because I really want them to understand, how international politics works behind the scenes. And the question then ever - I am not now at the University of Zurich, but I've done well at the University of Basel, in the study of history (History) - And the students always ask then: "Ok, what do the people from" "What are the People from that plan mean? Those are now the bad guys from the bad guys from the bad guys. The I now want to see "And then I say:"!. Completely harmless "These are the chairmen of the joint Chiefs of Staff. These are the highest generals in the Pentagon. And the man here leftmost which is Lyman Lemnitzer. He signed this plan. He is the highest general in the Pentagon. Then the defense minister comes - that's a civilian function - the vice president and the president. So that's the point. And what I want to tell you is, that look as we. Or? So, depending on age. But for some they look like the own grandfather, and for the others see like it. The just do not look as bearded and with Turban, the evil Muslims - no, that's their own series. And the own series combined something very logical. These generals want to win. You just want to win, that's their Doctrine. And they say: "It's obvious that I have to kill for victory, too," yes? That is their belief. You do not have this idea, no weapon and so, but they are convinced: "I have to kill." And they say: "If I combine the lie to murder, then I'm better off." And I can confirm that. I've previously played handball and handball it is so: There's the defense, there is the gate, and you want to carry. Then you deceive left and go around to the right. We have always practiced. X-time. Do not say, "I go then rum right, you can on the side? "This does not work, but they deceive something, make a feint. You do this every day in sports. The make all. And why they do it? Because they want to win. You want in the end have more goals, and that is civil completely ok. But if we go into the Armed Forces and give someone a Ship blows up, then says: "The other's it", then bombed and Children die, then the limit is exceeded. What we know that this exercise was not carried out, ok. Has not been made, that is a plan. But Kennedy has heard and has stopped him and then Lemnitzer, these General, added. The problem was, he was already the highest general of the United States. Where should he him since put out? After Europe, ok! He has him as the Supreme Allied Commander NATO, sent as chief commander of NATO in Europe. Such people we get exported. Now here is what really happened: The thing is out of control. The Americans have in fact observed that the Russians nuclear weapons stationed in Cuba have - then, in 62. So at the exact moment when you this covert warfare planned. And here they have the satellite images. Jürgen Elsässer [Note the writer: Previous Speaker] has explained previously. At that time people pictures presented by the American Nuclear weapons, and the world was actually on the verge of a military conflict, the nuclear could have ended. Here you can see Russian ships and American ships. Kennedy has said the Russian Vessels down in Cuba, we have to stop. And then have some people asked: "Yes, and if that does not stop ?!" They had no plan. They had no Plan what happens when that goes wrong somehow. And they were all highly armed, and we are today still. We are a highly armed population here in the world. We are seven billion and were never armed so high. And that is why it is very, very difficult that the group, which campaigns for peace, armed themselves, in the sense of information. You have to understand how these games were played, because: there are the same games over and over again. Here again the missile crisis. The dignity averted thanks to Kennedy because - Kennedy has prevailed even against their own generals. The own generals have said: "Now we bomb but, here we go, we make the island floored. "He has not made, has against the military-industrial defended complex, and was then shot in 1963 under mysterious circumstances. Here they have his defense secretary, Robert McNamara. It was then from the next Government adopted, and that is the Johnson administration. You see, Johnson is the president, has replaced the Kennedy after the death of Kennedy. And Johnson has subsequently said at the UN: "We support the United Nations as the best way suitable, to maintain world peace, and to contribute to the good of humanity. "must now Introduced this hypocrisy. On the one hand one is planning to ships in the air to blow up and attach it to the fiddle, and on the other side says you before the UN that it supports the UN. And the UN indeed forbids wars of aggression. you also prohibits staged terrorism. It is the Charter of the peace movement by she says, we must get away from the wars. And they must also understand that if the people understand that of course of time is a chasm deep distrust of politics. This is simply the normal result when lied so bitter and so hard that you can not the deal anymore dares. I have here a book on the subject written, "The Cuban Missile Crisis - UN without chance" where I just looked to see what actually happens in the UN, if covert warfare is used. And as in the moment when the Americans the Bay of Pigs invasion do 61, leave bombs in Cuba fall, and then the Cuban ambassador hits the UN, the Security Council, and says: "Hello, we are bombarded, which are ! Americans "And then says the American ambassador:" No, that's not us. That Cuban pilots who are frustrated such by the dictatorship of Fidel Castro that they desert, and before that bomb their country. "And then says the English Ambassador: "Yes, my colleague, the Americans, has said that, I think that's true." And the French also says, "Well, then it will have been." And the Cubans goes out completely frustrated and thinks: "The Europeans and the Americans are scoundrels!" And he's right. That's the problem. If you until now the facts nor the head have, we have in 1953 to overthrow the government in Iran with false flags Strategy of tension, we have planned the 1962 False flag stop with blasting of ships, which is not made was, but the Bay of Pigs invasion was made. And now I come to Vietnam. During the Vietnam War, it is that time just President Johnson was in power - Kennedy had just been killed - and he then 1964 August said that the Vietnamese have attacked the Americans, namely attacked so-called Gulf of Tonkin, which is a corner of this sea, just before Vietnam lies. And then came the in American newspapers - which is a section of a American newspaper - "North Vietnamese attack US Destroyer" - Destroyer a ship attack is called attack. That is easy: The Vietnamese people a American warship attacked. And this type of communication is maintained, the home population, so how can I say to lead to war, yes. You need to Home Population always say: We were attacked and why we react now. You can not say: "Our soldiers have invaded a peaceful country and the children massacred ". Then people will say: "Are not?" But when They say: "Our soldiers were there on a ship and were attacked" then it is only so to speak properly, even if a strong nation defends itself. And this kind the consideration will be used again and again. Johnson then declared on August 4 that the US now with the bombing of Vietnam begin. You know, that has become a gigantic disaster, has the Vietnam War caused untold misery. We have about 3 million dead Vietnamese, about 50,000 dead Americans, we have ... .. - so I'll spare you the But you know it. is a giant abomination. War is and remains an anathema. What interests me now: Did this attack actually took place? So in August 1964, as we go back again exactly. And it's about the ship Maddox - the So this ship (an original image thereof), which was actually in the region and of which one has said that Vietnamese people with torpedoes which are weapons that swim in the water, shot at this ship. And now the American secret NSA in 2005 Documents published in which it appears that there was no attack, ok? So even the American NSA conducts its own history, in this case, written by Robert Hanyok, and he has confirmed what many of us historians have always said: "There was no second attack on US ships in the Tonkin on August 4, 1964. "So there was not this attack and you can tell this 3 million dead Vietnamese then somehow based on an error. So not a mistake of Johnson, because Johnson wanted war, but he needed it were a casus belli. I only have 2 pictures brought back from Vietnam. That's 8 June 72 - which is actually my year of birth (72), so I think that's also personally very, very interesting. What happened then? Since the Americans have napalm bombs dropped on villages - and that is this 9-year-old Kim Phuc Phan Thi - which is very, very well known, because this Image circulated around the world. At that time still have the American journalist uncensored images can shoot and since these images were in the European and American offices accommodated and which has produced a large antiwar movement - you may recall, the students who have demonstrated, etc., etc. The Pentagon has learned from that is no longer true. You can no longer simply wandering in the war zone as a journalist and shoot pictures. Since you have a good chance that you will himself killed by friendly fire. Because you do not want, so, you do not want, that these pictures come out. At the end loss Vietnam. 3 million dead Vietnamese, 58.000 dead Americans..
Here is a picture of a family in January 1966 - Women and children flee from the War. They are always easy in the crossfire come and what you need to understand is, these people have no chance to Gulf of Tonkin Incident educate dated 4 August 1964th They have the training no, they have not the books, they do not have the Internet, they have simply not OK? But they realize simple. It hails bombs and I do not want that. But as I would like but also congratulate it were, that you advanced a have information stand, because then you know things that are difficult to digest partially are, but you can better argue against war and terrorism, and that is the Sense! (Applause)..
I want to make you realize that the secret warfare executed by a minority becomes. These are not 5% of people worldwide. So their neighbors and their friends who do not ... - so to speak - in leisure time they blow yet a house in the air and stage a war, right? But these are very, very few who perpetrate these crimes Extreme and therefore you should not change your humanity image such that you think at the end: "The people would also be nice if the die!" That would not be my plan, but you should continue to see the beauty in people and just see that there are few, there are very, very few that are in very, very have entangled great force! (Applause) I always say that even the students because: the students are 20 years old and if they did to me once a course - one semester is 12 weeks - then changes the already her picture, yes. But I always tell them: Here we examine a special case of Crimes that are also difficult to explain, because it governmental bodies are involved. But that is not the human image dim overall. Because Check out your friends, who you know, who killed someone? Whom know you know of someone raped? Since you are looking for a long time, but when They are in these units in special forces or the intelligence, which is a phenomenon which is known..
Now we come to Italy. I was there times interesting: it has only taken place in Vietnam or Cuba, Guatemala and Iran, so to speak, at the periphery - we really do not care, are all barbarians somehow, so at least is sometimes the impression - or has taken place in Europe? And then I have taken during my doctoral dissertation 4 years to the "Operation Gladio" to be screened..
At first I was in London - at the "London School of Economics" and have my professors asked whether they know about something. That was really a very, very good school and has boasted that we as among the best in the world - But who had no idea, so no idea. No one really knew anything for "Operation Gladio". And that is why I can tell you - also at Swiss universities, when they go to the professors of history and political scientist, or if they go to those who teach international law, then the knowledge of concealed Warfare very, very bad. Why? One says that the source location is not good. And I can only give them right - the source situation is miserable! Because the secret and the special forces always cover up. Yes. That's their idea. You do not always have everything: "Hello, this Gulf of Tonkin - we have done so!" But they are trying to cover their tracks. And most scientists have now sneaked out from the responsibility and say: "Because the source material bad is, I now examine the construction of fortresses in the Jura south foot in the 17th century. " (Laughter from audience) And you can also do it. Yes, because the source material is better - but we have just a whole area, so gave up a whole field of research, just because we are afraid that we make mistakes. And I always say it is error possible in the analysis of covert warfare - because it is opaque. But that which turns out shells now, is sound knowledge! When "Operation Gladio", it is so that we had terrorist attacks in Italy in public places - Bologna is the most famous stop - but we also had in Milan, 1969, or Peteano 1972 terrorist attacks. And most of all this stop Peteano 1972 - Peteano is a small village in the north of Italy - has led to a Italian coroner has examined this attack precisely. And he came to the conclusion that here bombed before and had three, I think three people killed. Carabinieri - these are people the paramilitaries in Italy. The have been lured into a car and have opened the trunk and then the car flew into the air. What we have today a day. At that time has only started. And then it was said that these are the "Red Brigades". These are the Red Brigades in Italy - an extreme left-wing terrorist group. And they were told, the left-wing extremists are and thus has discredited the entire Left in Italy - it has been said: "The Communists and the Socialists in Italy - these are terrorists!" Later it has been found that these were not the left - but that the the rights were. That the made in Italy, the far right and the left in the shoes have pushed. And now they have something they already know. This is: "False Flag - strategy of tention" Do you know the term? I have previously introduced. This is create false flag and voltage. A terrorist attack, which they need to understand, does not aim to kill the people who are gone. These are not the interesting people because they that have no influence, but those who observe it and think, "That could have been me - I need also that flight or those Station or buy 'here and on this square. "And so the people in fear is Terror displaced and who are dead are not so set in fear and terror. "In a wooded area near the Italian village Peteano exploded on May 31, 1972 a car bomb. The bomb killed three members of the Carabinieri. "(Text from the image) And that is the stop has actually then meant that you revealed that that there is a secret army in Italy named "Gladio". Revealed that has an Italian investigating judge. And I also want to again the support, what has been said before - I do not know who said that. I think Mr. Sasek said: There are good hands - there are very many people in the world who actually would like us to have less violence. The really would like us better in a World go inside and to enrich without own idea itself or benefits to gain, discover things and the Italian judge Felice Casson is one of them. And he says what he has found is the following: "As far as intelligence the relates, the Peteano attack is part of what under the strategy of tension was to be understood. And so that is, to create tension within the country and thus promote conservative, reactionary social and political trends. While this strategy was implemented, it was necessary to protect those who stood behind, because evidence had been discovered for their participation. Witnesses held back their information to right-wing extremists to protect ". In Italy the Communist Party at that time was very, very strong. The was strongly represented in Parliament and NATO feared that the Communists eventually provide a defense minister. And then would the Defense so to speak, told the secrets of NATO directly Moscow by telephone - that was actually fear. And it was said: "You have to fight." And that can you can do with the strategy of tension. Revealed it Felice Casson - So this man here. (Picture) And then he has the Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti forced to admit it. Andreotti in 1990 said: "Yes, there was a up but that was the CIA and the MI6 - Secret Army in Italy named "Gladio" and wanted the order to keep the Communists in Europe at bay. "You have constructed this secret army that in case of invasion of Europe behind enemy can lines guerrillas fighting. That was the basic idea. But there was a second idea, that these units can also be used against the peaceful people when the People voting incorrectly. On August 3rd Andreotti confirmed the existence of the secret army named "Gladio". He said it was part of a secret network of NATO, which is constructed by the CIA and MI6 was also outside Italy exist. In other words, he said: "Yes, secret armies, there are in Italy - but not only in . Us "That was quite interesting - the French have said," That there was at us not, "Mitterrand said that, and then Andreotti said," Yes, hello ?! At the last session, the French were also there. "Then Mitterrand had to correct - So, that's something no one talks about the love. Yes! Secret armies concealed, Warfare, staged terror - because they always say: That there are only gone far - at we do not yet..
Vito Miceli the head of the Italian military secret service "Servizio Informazioni Sicurezza Militare" - SISMI has said: "Gladio was part of the Italian secret service SISMI." And he has gotten, because he had to testify in court and sometimes has said: "That does not exist." And he even went to jail. "I am in prison gone, because I would not admit the existence of this super secret organization. And now comes Andreotti and inform the Parliament. "So he was mad. For them, it is enough if they remember: "Gladio" is an operation of the Italian Military intelligence in cooperation with MI6 and CIA. I have about a then Book written "NATO secret armies in Europe - Staged terror and covert Warfare ". And in this book I Vincenzo Vinciguerra quote, which is one of the right-wing extremist who carried out this terrorist attack in Peteano. That is, he has only helped to elucidate the whole system and he then behind bars, So out of prison, declared: "You had to attack civilians, men, Women and children, innocent people, unknown people far away from the political Game were, "said Vinciguerra. He was just as perpetrators of Peteano-stop been transferred. "The reason was simple. The attacks were the people the Italian people, to bring the country to greater security to ask ... ". That is, if they are running strategy of tension, they can then say: "From . Eight o'clock curfew "Okay, then all stay at home and think:" Yes, yes, that's a good idea - is indeed a dangerous world ". When they first have no terrorist attack and they say: "From eight o'clock curfew." Then people come and say, (Italian), ie "At eight o'clock in the evening we take the Pizza and Vino Rosso, so that's no way. Yes, how did you come to the ? Idea curfew "And they say:" Yes, we need more money for Police and we have to monitor them even better, "then they will still say:" Want we all But when they have not. "a terrorist attack, they say "Yeah, yeah, you can move in with me in the living room." That is, this technique is directed to the living not to the dead, okay? They need to understand. This is a huge analytical Failure of many people who think: "Ha, fortunately, am not taking." - But! They were the goal, it has taken it. My book on the NATO secret armies were translated into several languages ​​- which can one read..
In Switzerland, there was a secret army, called P26, and led by Efrem Cattelan, who is now deceased - and that was also uncovered 1990 levels. But I would say, the P26 has committed no terrorist attacks, okay. Luckily not, I tell them. I was still with members of the P26 a little arguing, because I said, we were on the MI6 - English Secret Service - we were indirectly linked to NATO, which we did not have just may be because we were still neutral. This is a separate debate, I can now not deepen; for them it is enough that there was the P26 in Switzerland that they no Terrorist attacks executed. She really waited for the Soviet enemy, the I glaub' people. So we had arms caches at different locations in Switzerland. And Cattelan - pictured here - this is the head of the P26, said: "The Villiger "- So, Defence Minister Villiger, who was allowed to pay for the whole affair ultimately, "Was caught on the wrong foot. He had not yet opened. " That is, he did not know that we had the secret army - but was Defense as Bundesrat - and then came the PUK EMD - that is the parliamentary inquiry. not with us but, or I say that only because we Swiss have always felt? With us nothing. With us - everything clear. - As I always say: "We have no wars and we have no terrorist attacks, but but we also have items that need to be studied and should. " We have then for the Federal Council - has the P26 - purchased in Ireland a house: This is this Lissard-house, and in case of a Soviet invasion of Switzerland could have been the Bundesrat evacuated there. One can indeed understand and say, maybe there is this a good idea, I do not want to evaluate, but I tell only: There are these covert operations and is interesting when one is dealing with it. It is interesting then - you asked NATO (which is the largest military alliance of World), what they can say about these events. And this NATO said on November 5: "We never planned Guerrilla Warfare." And then the next day, on November 6, she said: "What we said yesterday, is wrong and today we can not say more because it's a secret. " Yes, and I have often had correspondence with NATO, the CIA letter Contact ... The tell them nothing, okay. They are not transparent. I have a "Freedom of Information Act "(FOIA: gives everyone the right of access to documents of the executive the United States to require Wikipedia) asked the CIA. I have on the Swiss Ambassador, in the "Partnership for Peace at NATO demanded documents. - You get nothing. They are not transparent. They do their thing, and if they, as citizens believe, because you can ask certainly, if you want - no, they can not. The European Union - as Parliament - then protested and said, "This Secret armies do not go. We protest against the, Assumption ', against the idea, , By Certain US military personnel '- ie by some American officers and also by SHAPE (this is the "Supreme Hedquarters Allied Power Europe"), the headquarters NATO in Belgium, of the right to encourage the establishment in Europe of a clandestine intelligence and operational network ''. So: "We protest against the fact that the Americans and NATO have set up in Europe secret armies. " And the EU - ie the parliament - has then called for "a full investigation into ... thesis Clandestine organizations ... and the trouble of terrorism in Europe ". The EU has demanded that we examine these secret armies and also the problem of terrorism, whether they have anything to do with terrorism. And they can see then is ever nothing happens, simply nothing. And therefore, just because every politician can only lose if nothing comes out. And there is no connection - then was the ... (They can not win elections). If it comes out that there was something, have depending on the responsibility, because that party was in power, and that makes then no sense..
So, that would have been Europe. Going back farther, which is simpler. Operation Satanique (which means really that): 1985, the French have the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior blown up. This ship crashed into the Pacific, because the French there bombs lit - superficial atomic bombs - and Greenpeace did not want and then went there by ship. Then the French no nukes could more Kindle (which they wanted to test). And then Greenpeace has said: "You can not." Mitterrand was President and has said: "Power times the Greenpeace ship to the side." And as they get as a Greenpeace ship away? If they think again, they are the president, how to get it off? - Covert warfare. - Call the defense minister. The defense says: "Yes I care." The Secretary of Defense calls on the military intelligence chief and says: "rooms off it." The other says, "Okay, I'll handle it." The point is not itself. The then has a unit for covert warfare: The send combat divers who make a mine to the ship. The ship exploded and sinks. And it's really weg.- Okay, do it. You must be the President say: ". But I knew nothing about it" And so does the game, so it works. It could be traced but that the defense minister Charles Hernu the had given orders and had to resign. Then they secure as president and say: "Yes of Defense, all right, a less - away, but - also the head of military intelligence, they can even sacrifice (that is their line of retreat as president). - Pierre Lacoste, who was the boss of the DGSE (that's Directorate-General for External Security) was since 1982 the head of military intelligence, he had after the Rainbow Warrior scandal resign on 12 September 1985th And Lacoste has always said: "What do she, I would have done this attack without the okay of the President - what they believe because? . Of course not, "He always said:" I have this Okay get from the top. ".
And Mitterrand said - a Socialist: "Nee." Ok? Until his death he never told the truth about the Rainbow Warrior. And then a photographer but died on the ship - this is a Greenpeace photographer. And his daughter Marelle, and still had said: "That will not do, my father used against nuclear tests and dies in a terrorist attack. How unfair is this. " Of course it is so that more and more people understand that this covert warfare much damage wreaks. It is not right. When you think, ... It's not right when a State carries out a terrorist attack. These are pay tax dollars, and tax is already stressful, but if so then concealed Warfare is operated, is exceeded the red line. Francois Mitterrand, the only Socialist President - he has survived the Rainbow Warrior scandal. He had defense minister and intelligence chief sacrifice, but ruled from 1981 to 1995. This means that they have as president the opportunity use covert warfare and political survival, it is possible. Do you still? Yes! (Calls the audience). It's a bit much? We still make a bit further, right? Kuwait 1990. There are the so-called Nayirah who know some of them. The still do not know, which I explain again how that worked. You can, if they attack a country that does not say, "we capture the oil". They can at make best will no tasty, but they have a different story to have. In 1990 in August Saddam Hussein in Kuwait had occurred, incidentally, that was the same time when in Italy Andreotti "Operation Gladio "revealed, and that was a big mess, because you did not know what Crisis is now more important. But we go to Kuwait. Saddam has invaded Kuwait and then you said: "We have to go to Kuwait to liberate Kuwait" President Bush said in USA, Bush Senior. And then have some American generals said, "Yes, why?" Has Bush said, "can not a country in another country march, will not do, is contrary to international law, is against the UN charter ". Then the generals have said in the US, "yes, but the US is indeed just one year previously invaded Panama ". Has Bush said, "that's something completely different." And to Kuwait he has said, "we have since back". Since the generals have said, "It's because probably only about oil", and then Bush has said, "No, it is about the epic Battle of good versus evil. "And so, every war is sold. An epic battle of Good versus evil, and thus this war will sell better, one has the so canceled. It has been said: "Saddam's soldiers are not purely to Kuwait, but in Kuwait are they to the hospital and the hospital are on the department for newborns and then have torn the newborn from the incubators out and head first to the ground defeated. "This is infanticide and the children in the incubators are the most vulnerable Children. So the children they still take the weakest and kill them. OK, as they have it. This is brutality. This has not Bush, the father tells and also not Schwarzkopf, who led and won the war, but having a girl tells. Ein16-year-old girl said: "I have worked as a nurse in this Hospital worked. I've got it with my own eyes. "And as she wept. And now they have to be careful. If someone, a 16-year-old girl, with tears on Infanticide speaks, then you come psychologically speaking, ok. You are einparkiert. They think: "what? Can not be? Or? But this is now ... .. but that's enough, from the war. These are barbarians. Where is that? Iraq, Iran is the same country? " And they are so emotional that they are immediately ready for a war, although first you thought life: "I want to kill anybody and I do not even others support the others kill, I do not know. " I have a bit more fully described in this book, "Europe in the oil rush". About the mass media which is carried in every living room, right? "You have babies torn from their incubators ", then says Bush on television, and the television is in each apartment, and therefore the device is dangerous. (Applause) It's as if now someone would come to their house and he would with a ketchup-box so the wall ... lubricate. Hmm, in a beautiful Swiss exchange. Then you'd go ballistic and say: "And the curtains are still red, you go to?" Ketchup on the Wall, on the sofa, on the curtains, did not work. "But what comes out of the TV, is much more dangerous. It comes out every day and it is aimed at greater damage. As we have completely lost the ratios. After the war - I tell them, the historian are slow but precise - after the war, we were able to demonstrate that the incubator story just a lie, so she's Nayirah. The girl, named Nayirah, never in this hospital worked. But it has been seen as a Kuwaiti, because: she was the daughter the Kuwaiti ambassador in the United States. - Yes, it's that easy. You must, of course, have also to look and I want to say, too, has been misused. A 16-year-old Girl, yes, the teen might tell different things that are not always true, but they do not tell a war that is not their interest. Rather, it has been cast, selected in a Castinghow. As an emotional ambassador and selected from an advertising message that called Hill & Knowlton. They had a budget of 1 million. To the war for sale. This budget was paid by Kuwait. And so each section has its. The Kuwaitis have subsequently overtaken by the Iraqis billion in reparations, war reparations. And the Americans have got military places in Kuwait. Especially at the end of the cold War, during the Cold War, one could never do that. But in 1990, Soviet Union in the crisis, immediately in the Persian Gulf, immediately where the oil and gas is located. 2003 ABC weapons. You know, since I go faster. "We have reason to Assumption that nuclear weapons Saddam Hussein is building, "said Dick Cheney, then vice president. That was a lie, just lie. Because now nothing works. The students ask "why ? Are not people in prison "Then I say:" To those belongs the prison ". It is not so easy. (Applause) You can not go and say: "Yes, the Iraq war is a war of aggression, the resist encounters based against the UN Charter, international law, on lies ... ABC weapons ... so they go to jail. "Can not. Is not easy. Because: the altitude of these people is very high, they have no way to arrest the. Of course, I noticed, Cheney knows the business of covert warfare, because he was defense minister, was offered as this story (image of the "Nayirah"). - Do most people completely forget that who has done something sooner. But who has quite a resume. The peace movement has then to attack demonstrated on Iraq, we had demonstrations in Bern, London, Rome, Berlin, big, great peace movements. It had no effect. The British have said: "The Iraq possesses chemical and biological weapons, its missiles are ready for use within 45 minutes, " (Tony Blair). Again, not a word is true. And therefore, because these lies so thick be, and know now today almost everyone that that's a lie, there is this distrust against the leaders. The war ... the war in Iraq has 100,000 deaths required. (Picture of a soldier with MG) I have chosen this and they know I could show very different pictures. I sift the images at home and want them not cause psychological harm. Just so I'll show an innocuous image. But the rest with the amputated children and battered skulls and so, that's war. If they working against war, they are always right. Since they do not have the details understand, they're already on the good side. What was done at that time by Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser, said she has a connection made by Al Qaeda and Iraq. That what you have done, you have the terrorist attacks of September 11, connected with the attack on Iraq and has said: "Yes, Saddam Hussein has not yet had any role in the September 11th." And the soldiers who really do not have a good education, which can Saddam Hussein and keep Bin Laden does not set well apart and they can also, it is so that can the terrorist attacks of 11 September - so to speak - do not scan. The get they emotionally not so good way. But we have studied the helmets. Yes the Helmets of soldiers - that is their way of communicating, they always draw on the helmets. They have done in the Vietnam War, and they did it well in the Iraq war. And they see many soldiers, the Pentagon and the Twin Towers on the own helmet in Iraq war made. And in a 2006 survey, explained 85% of the US troops in Iraq that the main mission, why they ever run in this country war, consists in Saddam for his punishing role in the terrorist attacks of 11 September. And that, ladies and gentlemen, shows them how deep we are in the bottom. Saddam Hussein had no role in the terrorist attacks September 11. He is not one of the radical Muslims and the terrorist attacks September 11 is still a new field of research. I can enter it as yet. I would like but to say that this is still my most difficult field of research. I do research on 9/11 - but I can not say what happened to them. I know many here have in the room, the already made believe what happened. I am under very, very great pressure, that I plug in one or another group. And I always say there are three Stories. 1. It was Bin Laden - the US has surprised - 3,000 dead - that's the official story. 2. It was Bin Laden - but Bush and Cheney are criminal - who the stops seen coming and intentionally allowed - 3,000 dead - resource wars and civil rights shut down. 3. History: it was Bin Laden - ah, no, he was not. Third story: the videos of him are fake - the secret and the special forces - the people I always examine, these attacks running, attacked the people in order afterwards to declare a war on terror. These three stories are in the room, yes. I can not classify them them. "Surprise -LIHOP (Let it happen on purpose) and MIHOP (Make it happen on purpose) "I call them ... And I would always argue: you have to keep an open discourse here. But they will find out: when discussing 9/11 with neighbors that can be armed to lead. And that's bad. Actually, it should lead to deeper insight into international politics. I can tell you only about what we in discuss the research, these are the twin towers (shows picture on film), there is a flyer pure, in the other tower a flier goes in, the towers go down. This is for most people 9/11. In the background we have this World Trade Center 7 (separate building behind the Twin Towers on picture) - which also went down on 11th September. But there is no purely flyer. This means that this is the moment for me the difficult research task: 2 Aviator - three towers !! And this is not a detail - But we have the historians to solve, we need to find out why this. 3 Building has been dropped, although not a flier flew pure. This is the third building (shows picture demonstration of the fall of the third building). It goes fast down. In 9/11 Commission Report, which came out in 2004, it is not mentioned. Something is missing in the official history book .... Eh - not a book, it lacks a tower. The book is bad - they can purchase the book actually throw them into the shredder, because - when the largest terrorist attack in history, the official investigation have of Bush and there lacks a tower - then it gets. I was working at the Center for Security Studies at ETH Zurich and then went to the structural engineers and who have told me: "WTC 7 was probably . Burst "As I said:" No - there is no detonation on 11 September ". As they have said, "But - look here - you have to look at the corners" - sorry - I'll go back (to the film), "these corners of the building, walking in freefall" and - So, I'm now back and forth (with the sheets), so it was not. But that are the crucial moments when racking their research long head will either blow up or fire. (Next image) This is the other story. The US government has now submitted a report - in 2008 - by says (which is the National Institute for Standards in Technology) - "it was the fire that the building has brought down. "And as everybody has itself yet to decide - I can not take - they never imagined so good, as big the pressure on the research. When comparing the Prime Tower in Zurich - the tallest building in Switzerland - 126 meters high, WTC 7 is 170 meters high - if the building would have gone down in free fall, would we da Empa, we have the University of Zurich since, the University of Basel, we have the Federal - Not personally - but we would simply go around. Yes - concrete and steel should not go down..
And - what we are investigating now, is the story about the column 79 - that's this crucial pillar in the whole building. The WTC 7 has 81 steel columns - really strong pillars which are those pillars (picture), which are perpendicular. And this column was 79 been destabilized by an office fire, and therefore the whole building was in free Case went down. And that they can consider itself now. I want to point out that also being discussed in Japan. You are safe from time to time on the Internet, maybe they were recently times on this page (all laugh - Japanese page will be displayed) - this is a Japanese politician. The Japanese have no oil, yes? They want to know already, which is now a battle for oil and gas or a hunt for terrorists. And the terrorists are always where the oil and gas or how does it work? And who then actually discussed this WTC 7 in Parliament, Yes. They discussed the collapse in Parliament. I also have with Swiss parliamentarians so a bit of talking behind the scenes about the subject. And then the one Parliamentarians said to the other: "So - we take in the security policy Commission purely "And then the other said," No, that is, we do prefer Not. We are now discussing whether we should buy a fighter or not ... and these great things ... that's not our thing "So, that is. It is in the Switzerland discussed only behind concealed hand. At the university, the research is difficult and the Ministry of Defence it is also not desirable. That is, we are here speak a bit blocked. I suppose in Germany it is the same. What we still have is that I went through the TV channels to see how actually was reported when this collapse of WTC. 7 And when I saw the people know little about - ie, they know a lot, but I'd say that most people know little about the fact that this building is ever collapsed. And the reason This is because it has not been shown on television. And then I searched and searched and I found: BBC World has reported. Then I was happy. Did I thought: "Ah well - there is it still that quality media Television "And then I was then but disappointed because:. BBC reported early. (Some laughter) Yes, that's not funny. The have it reported in the 5 o'clock news and the building has fallen by 5:20 - and there we have historians one rule: "Always the event, then the report." (Laughter and applause). They laugh, yes. It is of course somewhere ridiculous and somewhere it is deeply sad. In fact, both, you know. It is this tension, in which we are today: on the one hand want we laugh, on the other hand we want to howl. Because - it is not entirely clear how to deal with to deal with the whole. It's just obvious that Jane Stanley reported here and the building in the background is still. And we have checked that, that's a correct image. And until 2008, the head of BBC World, which is Richard Porter apologized, and said: - What so much to say, "We were working on an incorrect news agency report." "! Sorry" like And then he says: "We had this statement form REUTERS." - "We have by Reuters. "But Reuters is the largest news agency in the world. So - there is no better, but it is worse. And what we have now is that Americans driving around with such a truck and there is then it: "Did you know a 3rd tower fell on 9/11" That is: "Did you know that a third high-rise building is collapsed on September 11, "And is below:" Building 7 not hit by a plane clapped in freefall "So". The building 7 collapsed ". Since then they have the Americans who watch the. This is now San Diego 2013. And which is then also an intense situation. Because - the people do not know that. And suddenly moves around there one and how are they to deal with? And that is what we have today: today we are all very, very much information to process. And - I do that myself also - I think that's partly exhausting - But there is no alternative. I believe that one has to get through: it is a moment of dis-illusion. But this dis-illusion in my opinion it needs. (Applause) The activists are there go (based on image), hand out fliers. I would be interested, of course, what Edward Snowden says about 9/11. Because: the NSA has definitely data to 9/11 - we have not these data. Maybe we will get it sometime. In this period is still this dispute WTC 7 continue..
But what can be observed at the moment already, is that actually the scientists and the journalists who question this war against terrorism, as terrorists themselves or conspiracy theorists are defamed. That means that they risk a lot when they make this kind of communication, I now doing for many years. And I Say it to them from their own experience, they have always again people who say: "You're a spinner, a conspiracy theorist" ... well "Terrorist" I was now never mentioned - but they are under attack. It is not possible, to address these issues and all rejoice in it. On the they can not wait. "Even countries like the US and Britain back investagive journalists and their Whistleblower now in the vicinity of terrorism. "Say" Reporters without Borders ". This means that I need a scientist who investagiven journalists and if the their job can no longer do, then we really do not have this data. Then there is a map where the information still good where it is bad - there may think of what they want (again refers to picture) ... ehm - where are we ... the Switzerland is ranked 15 - well. Well - so we have at least the opportunity to meet us without us after be removed, which is a plus - they rejoice. Ehm - agrees the map otherwise to not part. We continue. A Tour de France ... Good. Syria 2013. The villain in this game - Assad - who must be killed. You saw the yes - it is Bin Laden, it is Milosevic, it is Assad, it is now Putin - the changes permanently ... Bin Laden - which are always - Saddam Hussein - Which is always ... politics, chasing an evil man when he is dead, is it good again. So it is explained - true of course not in the matter. We in Syria the complex situation that we are told: the radical Sunnis be the solution. That these people (Picture). But these are precisely the people whom we have said at 9/11, which is Al Qaeda. And that would be for most people, a giant knob been in mind when you just the terms had not changed, saying "the is the free Syrian army. "OK? This means that, information warfare 'works: when the same unit is her boyfriend in one year and the next year their enemy, then they must rename the unit. OK? And now no longer inclined to Al Qaeda, but they are called "free Syrian army". And the fight against Assad and of course supported by Saudi Arabia - which are also Sunnis - and during other on the Page Kuwait also supported the Sunnis ... And then they also have Iran and Russia, which want to keep Assad in power. Now: here we have then the History that there were children, dead children. And that there were chemical weapons. And Carla del Ponte said: "We have testimonies of doctors, refugees in neighboring Countries and hospital staff that chemical weapons were used - but not of the government, but by the opposition. "That is, that is the government and the is the opposition. And of course, if one wants to intervene and wants to bomb Assad, then you have to have proof that he also these chemical weapons against the children uses. - OK?.
Then came in the media. This was a worst-case scenario: (Neue Zürcher Zeitung) "del Ponte suspects Rebels "(Blick.ch)" Syrian rebels to use poison gas have "(Spiegel Online) "Insurgents can used nerve gas have" (Reuters) "UN has testimony did Syrian rebels used sarin gas "(BBC)" UN's del Ponte says evidence Syria rebels used sarin ". But now the rebels are those which are supported by the US and Britain. That's not going. Here is really the media landscape in the wrong direction ran. Franco Cavalli has also said: "The only secure case of poison gas in Syria the jihadists was clearly attributed. "They apparently this get poison gas on Saudi Arabia, which is not entirely clear. Then, the UN has said: "Good, then we make a study of this poison gas" - and marched August 19, 2013..
The problem is, we have so much covert warfare that we almost did not meet - Hm, that's now the secret warfare from last year - and are on 19 August invaded and should investigate the attack of Aleppo in March, 2013. When would the studied alone, we would have probably had the conclusion that were the jihadists. And the Americans, the British and the Saudis would somehow wrong standing in the landscape. What is happening? They have a new stop on August 21, two days after the UN invaded, a new stop. More dead - and that's covert warfare. Such images: death - killed by chemical weapons children. The is always the impression: "we must again go to war, if your child feels rescue.".
And that is exactly wrong. But it works because the next messages are then these: (Blick.ch) "March Obama now in Syria?" (Time line) "West has little doubt to Assad's guilt "(stern.de)" Obama and Cameron threatens Assad "(The World)" also Merkel accused Assad of poison gas attack ". So for me, as a historian, that's August 13, sorry, I go back, which is May 13, you can immediately Groups swap, they just need to make improvements if it is wrong. And that's crazy. That's downright crazy. I was with Erich Gysling in Kuwait times since Arnold was also there and Ottinger Ulrich Tilgner. And we have - the situation in The Middle East is complicated because you have to not only keep Sunnis and Shiites apart can - but that's really far-reaching. And his assessment I like that - he says: "It could have been even Al Qaeda terrorists, the United States in a new want to move war ". Can also have been. He also used the term "Al Qaeda terrorists" he does not take Free Syrian Army, which he has already reconstructed, he himself released from this propaganda. I find a good man. But now we are through, because: Ukraine we had really been since we do not have again by, I believe, in this sense, I would like to draw my conclusion. First, I can assure you as a scientist with years of experience that There are covert warfare, that is a fact. That will be tomorrow so and also tomorrow, this is the first. The second is: the covert warfare is elucidate difficult and disturbs the peace movement tremendously. It is a Giant harm to the peace movement and I can only advise them that this kind of killing and lying critically observe. but I want thirdly, and this is the last thing I want to give them, advise them strongly that they understand that the an absolute minority. "The Crimes of the one procent", this is also called. So the crimes of a Percent. It's not - I would especially to the young people here in the room say there are many young people here - I do not want to say that the normal Human behavior is. It is not the normal behavior, but it is a psychopathic Behavior. It would of course be treated - sensitive, but (applause), there is very difficult for research to treat this because we often do not may say that there is. but I would like to encourage that they per se concrete Examples are based, they take a country and take it a date and they decline the time by which they desire whatsoever, and discuss this with someone else and they form their opinion. It's really about that everyone his opinion openly can form. In this sense, a lot of power for peace and you all the happiness that she will need..


##########################################