Did Rand Paul's Filibuster Work?

##########################################

You wanna know the most .

Interesting part about this rental filibustered which is getting.

I would say probably more positive reviews but there are just some people who like to call themselves progressive there no such thing who are saying oh how dare he ridiculous filibuster.

The most interesting thing the filibuster worked so when one mean by that because that obviously requires a little bit more explanation well attorney general eric holder sent a letter today saying quote that has come to my attention that you you now have aspin additional question this is to gender rempel.

Does the president have the authority to use a weapon is drawing to kill un-american not engaged in combat on american soil.

The answer to that question is now.

The film after work.

Now i don't care who you listen to whether it's you know the the more progressive media outlets are the.

The right meow would serve the ones that do the false equivalence it'll cost politically fifty neutrality alice.

The fact of the matter is the goal of rempel.

Doing a filibuster.

Was to get that sure is from the administration.

That you can't assassinate americans are american soil with a drone.

It has to do with the fifth amendment due process of law if you're an american here in america.

You do something it's a legal you'll get a trial.

These are things that go all the way back to magna carta which is written in twelve fifteen but i want to son would have ended at we're gonna become more primitive.

We're gonna de mal.

And he was this it's nonsense so look.

At least according to the letter from attorney general eric holder no matter how people try to spin it.

Business inside i had a headline for example usually do a great shops on this is really a a stab at their anything.

But then a headline saying attorney generals and the snarky letter back to it.

Factor brought the rainfall family.

Leaving snarky larry.

Basically saying okay you got us baird were saying it you're you can kill an american on american soil with the drum period that's it.

And ran towards water properly label.

Lappy.

Uh... so anxious to show you guys have been explain more explicitly as to how this is definitely all we need for rainfall of the constitution uh... let me regional what was said before by eric holder which was much more gray much more gray area and much more likely maybe if we feel like it it is possible i suppose to imagine an extraordinary circumstance.

In which you would be necessary inappropriate in the.

Constitution in apopka belongs in the united states for the president to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of united states.

So he said i'm saying this is why rentals don't really know wait a second.

And by the way the the nickname for of brennan.

The c_i_a_ take away the store mustering.

Is doctor jerome.

This is a guy who doesn't give a god damn about civil liberties any never did and he also by the way had hands-on uh... responsibility for bushes torture program.

This is suing a liberal democrat pics to be the head of the c_i_a_.

Who does that.

As rent paul said accurately the beginning of a speech in many times during this filibuster not candidate obama.

Not brocco model from two thousand seven.

Uh... continues.

Espy by.

Senate republicans wednesday whether whether that meant the u_s_ could kill any suspected terrorist who was not posing an imminent threat holder said the question was not appropriate why is that not appropriate that's only the most appropriate question i've ever heard do you think.

The executive branch.

Has the right to kill american citizens on american soil without due process of law now there are killing some of the milwaukee until this guy the engine of the question again as rambo studies on the bazaar right.





##########################################